A Vietnam Perspective by Lt. General James Link, U. S. Army (ret.)
 


 I believe you'll appreciate this speech as it provides perspective often
 overlooked by the media in characterizing the conflict in SEA. General
 Link, the former commander of Redstone Arsenal, delivered this address
 at the breakfast commemorating the arrival in Huntsville, Alabama of the
 traveling Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall.


 
 Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests, fellow veterans,
 and especially fellow veterans of the war in Vietnam.  It is indeed a
 tremendous honor for me to stand before you this morning as we come
 together to remember fallen comrades, MIAs/POWs and a very important
 time in our lives. A time of war, a time of conflict not only in
 Southeast Asia, but throughout our nation. Indeed a time that has shaped
 our national consciousness, and for we veterans, a time which forged a
 sense of self that in many ways defines us still today.

Lest we forget, how then do we remember?  How do we honor those who did not come home, or came home broken and bent in both body and spirit?

I remember when the architectural design of the Vietnam War Memorial Wall was first proposed.  Many of us recoiled at the thought of a ditch on the Mall,
 listing nothing more than the names of those who paid the ultimate
 sacrifice.  Surely, this was yet one more insult hurled at those who had
 answered the call to serve their nation rather than serve themselves.

 But that wall has transcended all things political and overcome
 controversy, as it reaches out to us who served, and even those who did
 not serve, while deeply touching all of us who lost comrades, friends,
 neighbors and loved ones during that troubled time. The mystery of the
 wall is found in its majestic simplicity.  Panels of black stone that
 hold not only the names of those killed, but in its mirror-like finish,
 the faces of all of us who come to witness its solemn statement.  In
 that reflection, we are made one with the monument, we join its essence,
 and are consumed by images behind the names.  Images of young men, their
 lives cut short, their personal sacrifices often unrecorded, their
 selfless service, unflinching courage, and the unique love and caring
 that is shared by comrades in arms.  It is the wound on our National
 Mall that never heals, but it does serve to soothe the deep scars on
 those of us who carry heavy memories, and for some perhaps a little
 guilt for having been the ones fortunate enough to return to "the
 world."

As this Memorial travels around the country it invariably brings
 with it a lot of discussion and perhaps even rekindled old arguments
 about the Vietnam War.  The arrival of the Vietnam Memorial Wall in
 Huntsville provides an opportunity for us to reflect on this important
 period in our individual lives and our nation's history.  Of course,
 there are those who might say we veterans are still too close to the
 heat of battle, too burdened by personal experiences to make objective
 judgments about the Vietnam War.  To that, I say Bull!  I've grown weary
 of those in the media, academia and the entertainment industry, who
 would purport to speak for us, or to try to define us a bunch of
 hair-trigger psychopaths on the verge of insanity or some unspeakable
 violence.

We who were actually there know what we saw, and we know what
 we did.  Each of us is just one of the millions who proudly served,
 having done our duty with honor.  I see little of what I experienced
 reflected in Oliver Stone's movies.  I personally think Oliver donated a
 few too many of his brain cells to his drug use.  In my view, movies
 like "Apocalypse Now" are nothing more than a collection of psychotic
 experiences made up in Hollywood bearing scant resemblance to the
 reality we experienced. You and I can certainly recognize the difference
 between artistic license and a lie, can't we!

America's involvement in Vietnam lasted for thirteen years, from 1960 to 1973.  Of course the result was not victory at all.  Not even a cease-fire or a demilitarized strip of land between North and South as happened in Korea.  Just negotiated terms allowing the United States of America to "withdraw with
 honor." Whatever that meant. So we didn't return home to victory parades
 and kisses in Times Square. Most of us were just another passenger
 aboard a chartered airliner (mine was a Braniff Airlines Boeing 707)
 painted a heinous green color.  What a beautiful sight!  Others came
 home in Air Force cargo planes to be dumped at some military base
 usually in the middle of the night.  Remember, we came home to antipathy
 and in many cases to antagonism.  We were told to quickly get out of our
 uniforms in order to avoid confrontations on city streets.

No wonder it has taken so long for many of us to even want to talk about the war. But talk we must for we are living witnesses, and if we are silent others
 will continue to spin a version of the truth that best suits their
 personal agenda.  We must dispel the myths that have grown up around the
 War, and there are so many.  Those of us who served must debunk these
 myths at every opportunity, and today is one of those.

The first myth is that the armed forces of the United States suffered a major military defeat in Vietnam. Our forces were never defeated in terrible battles
 where our soldiers and Marines suffered awful casualties, like Dak To
 and Hamburger Hill, and our airmen suffered too, many killed and
 captured in the air campaign, but the war was not lost as a result of
 these battles.  In fact, where we found the enemy we defeated him.
 After the Tet Offensive in 1968, the Vietcong and the North
Vietnamese operating in the south, were so soundly defeated that
they could not launch another major offensive until 1972.  That didn't
deter the North Vietnamese, since they were willing to lose the war on the battlefield, they were after victory in the minds of the American people.

Perhaps we could have won a military victory, but it would have taken many more than the 500,000 troops we had in Vietnam at the height of the war. Besides, by 1969, public opinion in the United States wanted us out of Vietnam.  The role of the media in deciding this issue has been the subject of many books and articles, so I won't go into that here.  I will say I don't believe the media caused us to lose the war, although some in the press were trying their best to make it so.  Those of you who attended the AUSA Conference in Washington this year will recall General Weyand's remarks while accepting the
 George C.  Marshall Award.  Following Tet 1968, he was interviewed by
 Walter Cronkite in the Mekong Delta following the resounding defeat of
 enemy forces there by the U.S.  military, including U.S.  Navy Riverine
 Forces.  Walter acknowledged the victory, but told General Weyand he
 preferred to report on the thousands of Vietnamese he had seen being put
 in mass graves in Hue after Tet.  In reporting this rather than any
 American victory, he said he hoped to bring a quicker end to the war.
 It didn't seem to bother Mr.  Cronkite that the bodies were those of
 South Vietnamese brutally killed by the North Vietnamese during Tet.
 Nor did it seem to bother him that he had compromised his own
 objectivity and integrity in reporting the war.  Of course, we who have
 dedicated our lives defending the Constitution against all enemies
 foreign and domestic certainly support all its provisions to include the
 First Amendment.  I just hope what we saw in the press in Vietnam and
 still see today isn't as good as it gets.  Our nation deserves better.
 

 The second myth is that somehow the soldiers in Vietnam were very
 different from those who served in World War II.  The myth purports that
 the Vietnam soldier was much younger, poorly educated, forced to go to
 war against his will.  It is often claimed that they disproportionately
 came from minority groups, while their better-off social superiors
 dodged the draft and stayed safe at home out of harm's way.  The truth
 is, of course, different.  The average age of the soldiers in Vietnam
 was just under 23 compared to around 25 in World War II where mass
 conscription prevailed.  The enlisted soldier in Vietnam was actually
 better educated: 79 percent had completed high school as opposed to just
 24 percent in World War II.  In Vietnam, 20 percent of the enlisted men
 had college degrees, three times the number in the Second World War.  In
 a democracy, even your jeep driver may be better educated than you. As
 far as social representation, studies have shown that blacks and
 Hispanics were actually slightly underrepresented compared to their
 percentage of the total population.  For instance, African-Americans
 comprised 13.1 percent of the age group subject to the military, they
 comprised 12.6 percent of the armed forces, and represented 12.2 percent
 of the casualties.  In 1992 a study looked at the 58,000 Americans
 killed in Vietnam and found that 30 percent came from families in the
 lowest third of the income range while 26 percent came from the
 highest.  Not much of a disparity when you look at the facts.

A third myth is that draft evasion was rampant during the Vietnam era and higher than in World War II.  Not so.  During the Vietnam War about half a
 million men were draft dodgers, and I bet you know some of their names!
 Only about 9,000 cases were actually prosecuted, and very few ever served   prison time. In World War II, 350,000 were prosecuted for draft evasion and
 many went to prison.

It is interesting to note that during Vietnam 10,000 Americans went to Canada, but up to 30,000 Canadians joined the U.S.  armed forces, and of those 10,000 served in Vietnam.  We all know cowardice in the face of the draft is not a new phenomenon, but during Vietnam it became an art form.  More importantly, draft dodgers made themselves out to be ethical and moral, while those of us who served were made out to be morally inferior, stupid, or just unlucky.  The
 radical left on our campuses had a clear goal of transforming the shame
 of the self-serving and the fearful into the guilt of the courageous.

A fourth myth is that casualties were disproportionately higher for
 enlisted men than for officers.  Actually, while officers killed in
 action accounted for 13.5 percent of those who died in Vietnam, they
 comprised only 12 percent of the troop strength.  Proportionally, more officers were killed in Vietnam than in World War II.  In Vietnam, we lost twice as many company commanders as we did platoon leaders, confirming in the
 Vietnam War that leaders led from the front.

Another interesting fact you can use to debunk a popular myth is that volunteers, not draftees, accounted for the majority (77 percent) of combat deaths in Vietnam. How many of those do you think were 18 year olds?  Just 101, or less than one tenth of one percent of all those killed.

Well, there are many other myths we could talk about, but instead I'd like to remind you of the humor that accompanied American soldiers in this war, as it has all the others.  I suspect many of you remember the time honored Murphy's Laws of Combat: * Don't look conspicuous .  .  .  it draws fire. * If
 it's stupid, but it works, it's not stupid.  * If your attack is going
 really well, it's an ambush.  * When you have secured an area, don't
 forget to tell the enemy.  * Friendly fire .  .  .  isn't.  * Anything
 you do can get you shot, including doing nothing.  * Never share a
 foxhole with someone braver than you are.  * A sucking chest wound is
 just nature's way of telling you to slow down.  * The buddy system is
 key to your survival .  . . it gives the enemy someone else to shoot
 at.  * It's not the one with your name on it you need to worry about,
 it's the one addressed: "To whom it may concern."

Remember, nine million men and women served in the military during the 13 years of the war, and three million of those served in the Vietnam theater. Two thirds of those who saw duty in Vietnam were volunteers and 77 percent of those who died were volunteers.  Our American citizen-soldier performed with a tenacity and quality that may never be fully appreciated or truly
 understood.

Should anyone think the war was conducted in an incompetent
 manner, should look at the numbers: Hanoi admits to 1.4 million of its
 soldiers killed on the battlefield compared to our 58,000, and about
 250,000 South Vietnamese.  And if someone tries to convince you that
 Vietnam was "a dirty little war", where Air Force and Navy bombs did all
 the work, you might remind them that this was the most costly war the
 grunts of the U.S. Marines Corps ever fought-five times as many dead as
 in World War I, three times as many dead as in Korea, and more total
 killed and wounded than in all of World War II.

To the Vietnam veterans here today, and to all those whose name appears on the Wall, I say you are all heroes.  Heroes who faced the issues of this war, including your own possible death, and after weighing those concerns against your obligation to your country, you decided to serve with honor.  In the
 words of a timeless phrase found on the Confederate Memorial in
 Arlington Cemetery, "not for fame or reward, not for place or for rank,
 but in simple obedience to duty, as they understood it." I ask each of
 you to treat each other with the dignity and respect you have earned.
 Reach out and welcome a fellow Vietnam veteran home.  God bless each of
 you, and may God continue to bless this America we love and serve.